GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 vs Wii U GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameLatteNV34 B1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 November 2012 (13 years ago)6 March 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speed550 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors880 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.8001.000
Floating-point processing power0.176 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A9.0a
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGLN/A1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 November 2012 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

Wii U GPU has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Wii U GPU and GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Wii U GPU is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 15 votes

Rate Wii U GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Wii U GPU or GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.