Radeon Vega 7 vs UHD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics and Radeon Vega 7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics
2021
10 Watt
5.14

Vega 7 outperforms Graphics by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking689619
Place by popularity423
Power efficiency40.0311.56
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameJasper Lake GT1Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 January 2021 (5 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256448
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0053.20
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−1822
+37.5%
1440p21−2428
+33.3%
4K12−1418
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 16−18 16−18
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 18 18
Resident Evil 4 Remake 12−14 12−14

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 16−18 16−18
Battlefield 5 28 28
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 14 14
Far Cry 5 20 20
Fortnite 63 63
Forza Horizon 4 37 37
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 24−27
Valorant 70−75 70−75

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 16−18 16−18
Battlefield 5 23 23
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 30−35
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58 58
Cyberpunk 2077 10 10
Far Cry 5 18 18
Fortnite 27 27
Forza Horizon 4 35 35
Grand Theft Auto V 17 17
Metro Exodus 13 13
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23 23
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18 18
Valorant 73 73

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21 21
Cyberpunk 2077 9 9
Far Cry 5 18 18
Forza Horizon 4 27 27
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 24−27
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13 13
Valorant 25 25

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14 14

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 12−14
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55 50−55
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8 7−8
Metro Exodus 6−7 6−7
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 40−45
Valorant 48 48

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 5−6
Far Cry 5 12−14 12−14
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 9−10

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 14−16

4K
High

Atomic Heart 5−6 5−6
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 16−18
Metro Exodus 2−3 2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 5−6
Valorant 25 25

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7 6−7
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 2−3
Far Cry 5 6−7 6−7
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 10−11
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 7−8

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7 6−7

This is how UHD Graphics and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • Vega 7 is 38% faster in 1080p
  • Vega 7 is 33% faster in 1440p
  • Vega 7 is 50% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.14 6.68
Recency 11 January 2021 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 45 Watt

UHD Graphics has 78% lower power consumption.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has a 30% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 30% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 10819 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3477 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.