Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU vs UHD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 600 605 610 615 620 730 (Rocket Lake) P630 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe G4 48EUs
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics and Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics
2021
10 Watt
5.16

Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU outperforms Graphics by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking684643
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Power efficiency39.92no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Xe3 (2026)
GPU code nameJasper Lake GT1Wildcat Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 January 2021 (5 years ago)1 May 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25616
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed750 MHz2600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−22.2%
22
+22.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 19
+0%
19
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics and Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU is 22% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.16 6.10
Recency 11 January 2021 1 May 2026

Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU has a 18% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
GeForce 945M GeForce 945M
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
RX 5300 XT AMD RX 5300 XT
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
RX 5500 AMD RX 5500
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
RX 5500 AMD RX 5500
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
RX 5500 XT AMD RX 5500 XT
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
RX 5500 XT AMD RX 5500 XT
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
vs
Graphics 1 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU
RTX 6000 Passive NVIDIA RTX 6000 Passive
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 10784 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics or Graphics 2 Xe3 Wildcat Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.