Arc A530M vs UHD Graphics

Place in the ranking	691	330
Place by popularity	4	not in top-100
Power efficiency	40.05	22.96
Architecture	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Jasper Lake GT1	DG2-256
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	11 January 2021 (5 years ago)	1 August 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	1536
Core clock speed	350 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	750 MHz	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm+	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.00	124.8
Floating-point processing power	0.384 TFLOPS	3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	16	96
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12
L2 Cache	no data	8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

Ring Bus

PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 5.14

Arc A530M 19.15
+273%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 2151

Arc A530M 8010
+272%

Samples: 43

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	110−120	110−120
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	40−45
Hogwarts Legacy	35−40	35−40
Resident Evil 4 Remake	40−45	40−45

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	80−85	80−85
Counter-Strike 2	110−120	110−120
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	40−45
Far Cry 5	60−65	60−65
Fortnite	100−110	100−110
Forza Horizon 4	75−80	75−80
Hogwarts Legacy	35−40	35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80	75−80
Valorant	140−150	140−150

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	80−85	80−85
Counter-Strike 2	110−120	110−120
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	230−240	230−240
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	40−45
Far Cry 5	60−65	60−65
Fortnite	100−110	100−110
Forza Horizon 4	75−80	75−80
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75	70−75
Hogwarts Legacy	35−40	35−40
Metro Exodus	40−45	40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80	75−80
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60	55−60
Valorant	140−150	140−150

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	80−85	80−85
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	40−45
Far Cry 5	60−65	60−65
Forza Horizon 4	75−80	75−80
Hogwarts Legacy	35−40	35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80	75−80
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60	55−60
Valorant	140−150	140−150

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

100−110

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	40−45	40−45
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	140−150	140−150
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35	30−35
Metro Exodus	24−27	24−27
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	170−180
Valorant	160−170	160−170

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60	55−60
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20	18−20
Far Cry 5	40−45	40−45
Forza Horizon 4	45−50	45−50
Hogwarts Legacy	21−24	21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33	30−33

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

45−50

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	18−20	18−20
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40	35−40
Hogwarts Legacy	12−14	12−14
Metro Exodus	16−18	16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30	27−30
Valorant	100−110	100−110

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	30−33	30−33
Counter-Strike 2	18−20	18−20
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	8−9
Far Cry 5	21−24	21−24
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	30−35
Hogwarts Legacy	12−14	12−14
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22	20−22

4K
Epic

Fortnite

20−22

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.14	19.15
Recency	11 January 2021	1 August 2023
Chip lithography	10 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	65 Watt

UHD Graphics has 85% lower power consumption.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has a 273% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.