Radeon Instinct MI250X vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking755not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)CDNA 2.0 (2021−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeAldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2021 (5 years ago)8 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3214080
Core clock speed350 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,496
Floating-point processing powerno data47.87 TFLOPS
TMUsno data880
L1 Cacheno data3.4 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data128 GB
Memory bus widthno data8192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,277 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_1N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 8 November 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm

Instinct MI250X has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and Radeon Instinct MI250X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI250X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 128 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs or Radeon Instinct MI250X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.