ATI Radeon HD 4225 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking722not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)RV6xx (2008−2010)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRS880M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (5 years ago)1 May 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3240
Core clock speed350 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm55 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 13644
+9611%
ATI HD 4225 141

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 1 May 2010
Chip lithography 10 nm 55 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Radeon HD 4225. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 38 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or Radeon HD 4225, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.