GeForce FX 5200 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs with GeForce FX 5200, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs
2021
2.11
+10450%

Graphics 16EUs outperforms FX 5200 by a whopping 10450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9361578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNV18 C1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (5 years ago)6 March 2003 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$69.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed350 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data29 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data150 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data8.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11-0−1

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 23 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 6 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 17 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 8 0−1
Fortnite 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 7 0−1
Fortnite 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 6 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9 0−1
Valorant 40−45 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16 0−1
Valorant 16−18 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 10−12 0−1

4K
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.11 0.02
Recency 30 March 2021 6 March 2003

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs has a 10450% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 18 years.

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 349 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs or GeForce FX 5200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.