L20 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) with L20, including specs and performance data.
L20 outperforms Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 1652% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 977 | 192 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.23 | 9.06 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 (2021) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Gen. 11 | AD102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 11 January 2021 (5 years ago) | 16 November 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 11776 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 76,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.8 - 10 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 927.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 59.35 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 128 |
| TMUs | no data | 368 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 368 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 92 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 11.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 96 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 864.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 8
−1650%
| 140−150
+1650%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1567%
|
50−55
+1567%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 1−2
−1500%
|
16−18
+1500%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1567%
|
50−55
+1567%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 6−7
−1567%
|
100−105
+1567%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1
−1500%
|
16−18
+1500%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1650%
|
140−150
+1650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−1600%
|
170−180
+1600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1627%
|
190−200
+1627%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1522%
|
600−650
+1522%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1567%
|
50−55
+1567%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
−1611%
|
650−700
+1611%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| Dota 2 | 12
−1650%
|
210−220
+1650%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 6−7
−1567%
|
100−105
+1567%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1
−1500%
|
16−18
+1500%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1650%
|
140−150
+1650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−1600%
|
170−180
+1600%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2
−1650%
|
35−40
+1650%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−1567%
|
50−55
+1567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1627%
|
190−200
+1627%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1522%
|
600−650
+1522%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| Dota 2 | 11
−1627%
|
190−200
+1627%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 6−7
−1567%
|
100−105
+1567%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1
−1500%
|
16−18
+1500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−1600%
|
170−180
+1600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1627%
|
190−200
+1627%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3
−1567%
|
50−55
+1567%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1522%
|
600−650
+1522%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1650%
|
140−150
+1650%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−1592%
|
220−230
+1592%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−1567%
|
300−310
+1567%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
−1650%
|
210−220
+1650%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1500%
|
16−18
+1500%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 4−5
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−1650%
|
35−40
+1650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−1650%
|
70−75
+1650%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−1567%
|
50−55
+1567%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1567%
|
50−55
+1567%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1633%
|
260−270
+1633%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−1600%
|
170−180
+1600%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 3−4
−1567%
|
50−55
+1567%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−1567%
|
50−55
+1567%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1567%
|
50−55
+1567%
|
This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and L20 compete in popular games:
- L20 is 1650% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.84 | 32.23 |
| Recency | 11 January 2021 | 16 November 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 275 Watt |
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has 6775% lower power consumption.
L20, on the other hand, has a 1652% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The L20 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook graphics card while L20 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
