ATI Radeon HD 4200 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G1 32EU Mobile G4 G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) G4 48EU Mobile G7 G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) G7 64EU Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4200 4250 4250 IGP 4290 IGP 4350 4350 AGP 4350 PCI 4350 PCIe x1 4450 4520 4550 4570 4570 Rebrand 4580 4650 4650 AGP 4670 4670 AGP 4670 X2 4700 4710 4720 4730 4730 OEM 4750 4770 4810 4830 4850 4850 X2 4855 4860 4870 4870 Mac Edition 4870 X2 4890

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) with Radeon HD 4200, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020
7 Watt
2.33
+763%

Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) outperforms HD 4200 by a whopping 763% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
ATI HD 4200 HD 4200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9111434
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.75no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2RS880
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2020 (6 years ago)1 August 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6440
Core clock speed200 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data181 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data2.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.0
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Palworld 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Fortnite 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Palworld 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Valorant 40−45
+64%
24−27
−64%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+254%
12−14
−254%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Fortnite 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
Palworld 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 40−45
+64%
24−27
−64%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 15
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 40−45
+64%
24−27
−64%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Palworld 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Valorant 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Palworld 3−4 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and ATI HD 4200 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 1200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 633% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) performs better in 25 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.33 0.27
Recency 28 May 2020 1 August 2009
Chip lithography 10 nm 55 nm

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has a 763% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
R9 M375 Radeon R9 M375
ATI HD 4200 Radeon HD 4200
vs
ATI X1950 PRO Radeon X1950 PRO
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1
vs
Radeon 680M 680M
Graphics 448SP Graphics 448SP
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)
Graphics 384SP Graphics 384SP
vs
H100 PCIe 96 GB H100 PCIe 96 GB
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
vs
Arc Pro B60 Arc Pro B60
Vega 9 Mobile Vega 9 Mobile
vs
R7 M265DX R7 M265DX
RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh 2060 Max-Q Refresh
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile 2050 Mobile
RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh
vs
Arc B580 Arc B580
Switch GPU Switch GPU
vs
RX 570 X2 RX 570 X2
Playstation 3 GPU 40nm Playstation 3 GPU 40nm
vs
RX 6800 RX 6800
Pro VII Pro VII
vs
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 16 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 307 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) or Radeon HD 4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.