Arc Pro B390 vs UHD Graphics 770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 770 with Arc Pro B390, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 770
2022
15 Watt
5.70

Pro B390 outperforms Graphics 770 by a whopping 298% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking658281
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.4021.94
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1Panther Lake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 September 2022 (3 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561536
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40120.0
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS7.68 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs1648
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 770 5.70
Arc Pro B390 22.69
+298%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1258
Samples: 14
Arc Pro B390 9453
+651%
Samples: 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−289%
70−75
+289%
4K13
−285%
50−55
+285%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 52
−285%
200−210
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−264%
40−45
+264%
Palworld 11
−264%
40−45
+264%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 12
−275%
45−50
+275%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
−296%
95−100
+296%
Counter-Strike 2 34
−282%
130−140
+282%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−250%
35−40
+250%
Far Cry 5 17
−282%
65−70
+282%
Fortnite 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Palworld 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Valorant 65−70
−294%
260−270
+294%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
−296%
95−100
+296%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−265%
350−400
+265%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Dota 2 43
−295%
170−180
+295%
Far Cry 5 16
−275%
60−65
+275%
Fortnite 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
Metro Exodus 5
−260%
18−20
+260%
Palworld 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−289%
70−75
+289%
Valorant 65−70
−294%
260−270
+294%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−296%
95−100
+296%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Dota 2 40
−275%
150−160
+275%
Far Cry 5 14
−293%
55−60
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
Valorant 65−70
−294%
260−270
+294%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−271%
130−140
+271%
Palworld 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Valorant 55−60
−297%
230−240
+297%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Palworld 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Palworld 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Valorant 24−27
−280%
95−100
+280%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 14
−293%
55−60
+293%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Palworld 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and Arc Pro B390 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro B390 is 289% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Pro B390 is 285% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.70 22.69
Recency 27 September 2022 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 433% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B390, on the other hand, has a 298% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 233% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B390 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B390 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1498 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Arc Pro B390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 770 or Arc Pro B390, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.