Arc 3 A370M vs UHD Graphics 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking738not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.45no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (5 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate20.8099.20
Floating-point processing power0.6656 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has 133% lower power consumption.

Arc 3 A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 750 and Arc 3 A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 443 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Arc 3 A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 750 or Arc 3 A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.