Radeon Steam Deck 8CU vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms Steam Deck 8CU by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 444 | 490 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 64.90 | no data |
| Architecture | no data | RDNA 2 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | RDNA 2 Sephiroth |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (5 years ago) | 9 November 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 512 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 1 MB |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 12
−133%
| 28
+133%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+25%
|
55−60
−25%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 24−27
+30%
|
20−22
−30%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+21.7%
|
45−50
−21.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+25%
|
55−60
−25%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+20.9%
|
40−45
−20.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9
−278%
|
30−35
+278%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
+19.4%
|
60−65
−19.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+20%
|
45−50
−20%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+21.1%
|
35−40
−21.1%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+13.4%
|
95−100
−13.4%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+21.7%
|
45−50
−21.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+25%
|
55−60
−25%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 170−180
+14.8%
|
150−160
−14.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 27
+28.6%
|
21−24
−28.6%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+20.9%
|
40−45
−20.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8
−238%
|
27
+238%
|
| Fortnite | 70−75
+19.4%
|
60−65
−19.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+20%
|
45−50
−20%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6
−66.7%
|
10
+66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7
−200%
|
21−24
+200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+21.1%
|
35−40
−21.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+22.2%
|
27−30
−22.2%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+13.4%
|
95−100
−13.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+21.7%
|
45−50
−21.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 25
+38.9%
|
18−20
−38.9%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55
+20.9%
|
40−45
−20.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8
−188%
|
23
+188%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+20%
|
45−50
−20%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+21.1%
|
35−40
−21.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+22.2%
|
27−30
−22.2%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+13.4%
|
95−100
−13.4%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 70−75
+19.4%
|
60−65
−19.4%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+20%
|
20−22
−20%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
+20.3%
|
75−80
−20.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+25%
|
12−14
−25%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+60.4%
|
50−55
−60.4%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+18.1%
|
100−110
−18.1%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+29.6%
|
27−30
−29.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 24−27
+25%
|
20−22
−25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+22.7%
|
21−24
−22.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+24%
|
24−27
−24%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+28.6%
|
14−16
−28.6%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30
+27.3%
|
21−24
−27.3%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+41.7%
|
12−14
−41.7%
|
| Valorant | 60−65
+25%
|
45−50
−25%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+38.5%
|
12−14
−38.5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+31.4%
|
35−40
−31.4%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 12−14
+33.3%
|
9−10
−33.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Steam Deck 8CU compete in popular games:
- Steam Deck 8CU is 133% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 60% faster.
- in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Steam Deck 8CU is 278% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) performs better in 55 tests (92%)
- Steam Deck 8CU performs better in 5 tests (8%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.59 | 10.38 |
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 9 November 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 21% higher aggregate performance score.
Steam Deck 8CU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
