Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 444 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 64.96 | no data |
| Architecture | no data | PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011) |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GMA 600 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (5 years ago) | 1 May 2010 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 4 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 9.0c |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 1 May 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
