Xe Arctic Sound vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking840not rated
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Power efficiency14.75no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2017 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1844096
Core clock speed350 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45230.4
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs3128
TMUs23256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data1,229 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.103N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 500 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has 3233% lower power consumption.

Xe Arctic Sound, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Xe Arctic Sound. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 4844 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xe Arctic Sound on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 630 or Xe Arctic Sound, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.