Arc G3 vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking840not rated
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Power efficiency14.75no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2Panther Lake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (8 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1841280
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4596.00
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs320
TMUs2340
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cacheno data640 KB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1IGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has 67% lower power consumption.

Arc G3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Arc G3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop graphics card while Arc G3 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 4844 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc G3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 630 or Arc G3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.