GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs UHD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD Graphics 615 HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics P630 Mobile 600 605 610 615 617 620 630 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670MX 675MX 675MX Mac Edition 680M 680MX Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 870M 880M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 620
2017
32 GB LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
2.47
GTX 775M Mac Edition
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
3.02
+22.3%

775M Mac Edition outperforms Graphics 620 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
GTX 775M Mac Edition GTX 775M Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking894827
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Power efficiency12.742.34
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2GK104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2017 (9 years ago)8 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921344
Core clock speed300 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0089.26
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS2.142 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs24112
L1 Cacheno data112 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
1440p16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
4K8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 7
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Fortnite 22
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Valorant 40
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 3
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 37
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Dota 2 20
−20%
24−27
+20%
Far Cry 5 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Fortnite 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
−20%
6−7
+20%
Metro Exodus 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Valorant 34
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Dota 2 18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Valorant 22
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Valorant 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 7
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 620 and GTX 775M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GTX 775M Mac Edition is 8% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 775M Mac Edition is 13% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 775M Mac Edition is 13% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.47 3.02
Recency 1 September 2017 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

UHD Graphics 620 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 567% lower power consumption.

GTX 775M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 22% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 620 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
R7 M260X Radeon R7 M260X
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
HD 6480G HD 6480G
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
GTS 360M GTS 360M
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
ATI Mobility X1400 Mobility X1400
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
GTX 750 v2 GTX 750 v2
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
GT 640 OEM GT 640 OEM
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
RX 580 XTR RX 580 XTR
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
ATI X1800 GTO X1800 GTO
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
FX 5500 PCI FX 5500 PCI
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
NVS 290 NVS 290
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
Pro 570 Pro 570

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 5453 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 33 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 620 or GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.