Extreme Graphics vs UHD Graphics 610

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking993not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.04no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Generation 2.0 (2002−2003)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT1Brookdale
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 April 2018 (8 years ago)2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed300 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.800.2
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs21
TMUs121

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusFSB
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 610 728
+72700%
Extreme Graphics 1
Samples: 1

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

UHD Graphics 610 has a 971% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 610 and Extreme Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 610 is a notebook graphics card while Extreme Graphics is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 770 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 64 votes

Rate Extreme Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 610 or Extreme Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.