Quadro T2000 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 600

Place in the ranking	1217	325
Place by popularity	93	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.38	24.72
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Gemini Lake GT1	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 December 2017 (8 years ago)	27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	1024
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.800	114.2
Floating-point processing power	0.1248 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	32
TMUs	12	64
L1 Cache	no data	1 MB
L2 Cache	no data	1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 600 0.80

T2000 Mobile 19.17
+2296%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 600 334

T2000 Mobile 7985
+2291%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 600 578

T2000 Mobile 13524
+2240%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10 −2200%	230−240 +2200%
1440p	1 −2000%	21−24 +2000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Palworld	4−5 −1075%	45−50 +1075%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Far Cry 5	0−1	60−65
Fortnite	0−1	100−110
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1480%	75−80 +1480%
Palworld	4−5 −1075%	45−50 +1075%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −825%	70−75 +825%
Valorant	13 −1015%	140−150 +1015%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	21−24 −959%	230−240 +959%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Dota 2	7 −1471%	110−120 +1471%
Far Cry 5	0−1	60−65
Fortnite	0−1	100−110
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1480%	75−80 +1480%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −4100%	40−45 +4100%
Palworld	4−5 −1075%	45−50 +1075%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −825%	70−75 +825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Valorant	11 −1218%	140−150 +1218%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Dota 2	7 −1471%	110−120 +1471%
Far Cry 5	0−1	60−65
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1480%	75−80 +1480%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −825%	70−75 +825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Valorant	27−30 −400%	140−150 +400%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	0−1	100−110
Palworld	4−5 −1075%	45−50 +1075%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	4−5 −3425%	140−150 +3425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1778%	160−170 +1778%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1350%	27−30 +1350%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	1−2 −4400%	45−50 +4400%
Palworld	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Valorant	6−7 −1600%	100−110 +1600%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−900%

20−22
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3

−900%

20−22
+900%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5

80−85

+0%

80−85

+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Palworld	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Dota 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
Epic

Palworld

16−18

+0%

16−18

+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is 2200% faster in 1080p
T2000 Mobile is 2000% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1440p resolution and the Epic Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 4400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T2000 Mobile performs better in 34 tests (58%)
there's a draw in 25 tests (42%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.80	19.17
Recency	11 December 2017	27 May 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	60 Watt

UHD Graphics 600 has 1100% lower power consumption.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2296% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics 600

Radeon HD 7600G

Quadro T2000 Mobile

AMD R9 M380 Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 4203 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.7 514 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 600 or Quadro T2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.