Radeon Pro W6600 vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 1030 GTX 1050 GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1070 GTX 1080 GTX 1080 Ti TITAN Xp Titan X Pascal TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro W6400 Pro W6600 Pro W6600X Pro W6800 Pro W6800X Pro W6800X Duo Pro W6900X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal with Radeon Pro W6600, including specs and performance data.

Titan X Pascal
2016, $1,199
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
31.14

Pro W6600 outperforms Titan X Pascal by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
Pro W6600 Pro W6600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking206160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.1423.78
Power efficiency9.7027.84
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP102Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 August 2016 (10 years ago)8 June 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Pro W6600 has 287% better value for money than Titan X Pascal.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841792
Core clock speed1417 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz2903 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9325.1
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS10.4 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs224112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache1.3 MB512 KB
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 31.14
Pro W6600 35.77
+14.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
Pro W6600 14964
+14.9%
Samples: 195

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124140−150
+12.9%
1440p7485−90
+14.9%
4K5865−70
+12.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.674.64
+52.1%
1440p16.207.64
+52.9%
4K20.679.98
+51.7%
  • Pro W6600 has 52% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Pro W6600 has 53% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Pro W6600 has 52% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 337 350−400
+3.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 83 95−100
+14.5%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 126 140−150
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 153 170−180
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 291 300−310
+3.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 74 85−90
+14.9%
Far Cry 5 162 180−190
+11.1%
Fortnite 210 240−250
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 127 140−150
+10.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113 120−130
+6.2%
Valorant 296 300−310
+1.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 147 160−170
+8.8%
Counter-Strike 2 205 230−240
+12.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+8.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 65 70−75
+7.7%
Dota 2 252 280−290
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 149 170−180
+14.1%
Far Cry 6 90 100−105
+11.1%
Fortnite 199 220−230
+10.6%
Forza Horizon 4 121 130−140
+7.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 160 180−190
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 96 110−120
+14.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113 120−130
+6.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184 210−220
+14.1%
Valorant 275 300−310
+9.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 137 150−160
+9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 57 65−70
+14%
Dota 2 232 260−270
+12.1%
Far Cry 5 140 160−170
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 112 120−130
+7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102 110−120
+7.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95 100−105
+5.3%
Valorant 181 200−210
+10.5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170 190−200
+11.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 111 120−130
+8.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230 250−260
+12.6%
Far Cry 6 61 70−75
+14.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 103 110−120
+6.8%
Metro Exodus 58 65−70
+12.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 200−210
+14.3%
Valorant 258 290−300
+12.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 95−100
+11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 37 40−45
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 101 110−120
+8.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 95−100
+10.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 60−65
+7.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85 90−95
+11.1%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 40−45
+14.3%
Far Cry 6 39 40−45
+2.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 99 110−120
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 36 40−45
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68 75−80
+10.3%
Valorant 257 290−300
+12.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 71 80−85
+12.7%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 40−45
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 17 18−20
+5.9%
Dota 2 160 180−190
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 53 60−65
+13.2%
Forza Horizon 4 73 80−85
+9.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44 50−55
+13.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60 65−70
+8.3%

This is how Titan X Pascal and Pro W6600 compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600 is 13% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6600 is 15% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6600 is 12% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.14 35.77
Recency 2 August 2016 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W6600, on the other hand, has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 56% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Titan X Pascal in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
vs
Instinct MI60 Radeon Instinct MI60
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
vs
Vega 7 Vega 7
Quadro P5000 P5000
vs
RX 5950 XT RX 5950 XT
Quadro P4000 P4000
vs
R5 310 OEM R5 310 OEM
Quadro P4000 P4000
vs
GTX 680 Mac Edition GTX 680 Mac Edition
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
ATI Xbox 360 GPU 90nm Xbox 360 GPU 90nm
GTX 1070 GTX 1070
vs
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
GTX 980 Ti 980 Ti
vs
GTX 580 580
GTX 980 Ti GTX 980 Ti
vs
M6000 24 GB M6000 24 GB
GTX 980 GTX 980
vs
9500 GS 9500 GS
R9 390X R9 390X
vs
RTX 3070 Ti RTX 3070 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 3014 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or Radeon Pro W6600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.