RTX A5000 vs Titan X Pascal

Place in the ranking	207	53
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.14	no data
Power efficiency	9.71	18.51
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code name	GP102	GA102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	2 August 2016 (10 years ago)	12 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	8192
Core clock speed	1417 MHz	1170 MHz
Boost clock speed	1531 MHz	1695 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	342.9	433.9
Floating-point processing power	10.97 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	224	256
Tensor Cores	no data	256
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	64
L1 Cache	1.3 MB	8 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB	6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1251 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480.4 GB/s	768.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 31.14

RTX A5000 54.60
+75.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026

RTX A5000 22841
+75.3%

Samples: 978

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	124	210−220 +69.4%
1440p	74 −38.3%	120−130
4K	58 −42%	100−110

Cost per frame, $

1080p	9.67	no data
1440p	16.20	no data
4K	20.67	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	337	550−600 +63.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	83	140−150 +68.7%
Hogwarts Legacy	119	200−210 +68.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	126	220−230 +74.6%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	153	260−270 +69.9%
Counter-Strike 2	291	500−550 +71.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	74	120−130 +62.2%
Far Cry 5	162	280−290 +72.8%
Fortnite	210	350−400 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	127	220−230 +73.2%
Hogwarts Legacy	90	150−160 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	113	190−200 +68.1%
Valorant	296	500−550 +68.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	147	250−260 +70.1%
Counter-Strike 2	205	350−400 +70.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280	450−500 +63%
Cyberpunk 2077	65	110−120 +69.2%
Dota 2	252	400−450 +58.7%
Far Cry 5	149	260−270 +74.5%
Fortnite	199	300−310 +50.8%
Forza Horizon 4	121	210−220 +73.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	160	280−290 +75%
Hogwarts Legacy	72	120−130 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	96	160−170 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	113	190−200 +68.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	184	300−310 +63%
Valorant	275	450−500 +63.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	137	240−250 +75.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	57	95−100 +66.7%
Dota 2	232	400−450 +72.4%
Far Cry 5	140	240−250 +71.4%
Forza Horizon 4	112	190−200 +69.6%
Hogwarts Legacy	55	95−100 +72.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	102	170−180 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95	160−170 +68.4%
Valorant	181	300−310 +65.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

170

290−300
+70.6%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	111	190−200 +71.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	220−230	350−400 +57.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	103	180−190 +74.8%
Metro Exodus	58	100−105 +72.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	300−310 +71.4%
Valorant	258	450−500 +74.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	85−90	140−150 +64.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	37	60−65 +62.2%
Far Cry 5	101	170−180 +68.3%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90	150−160 +74.4%
Hogwarts Legacy	41	70−75 +70.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60	95−100 +69.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

80−85

140−150

+72.8%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	35−40	60−65 +71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	99	170−180 +71.7%
Hogwarts Legacy	20−22	35−40 +75%
Metro Exodus	36	60−65 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68	110−120 +61.8%
Valorant	257	450−500 +75.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	71	120−130 +69%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40	60−65 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	17	27−30 +58.8%
Dota 2	160	280−290 +75%
Far Cry 5	53	90−95 +69.8%
Forza Horizon 4	73	120−130 +64.4%
Hogwarts Legacy	22	35−40 +59.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	44	75−80 +70.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

100−105

+66.7%

This is how Titan X Pascal and RTX A5000 compete in popular games:

RTX A5000 is 69% faster in 1080p
RTX A5000 is 62% faster in 1440p
RTX A5000 is 72% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.14	54.60
Recency	2 August 2016	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	230 Watt

RTX A5000 has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 8% lower power consumption.

The RTX A5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Titan X Pascal in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop graphics card while RTX A5000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega 11 Embedded

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 3014 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.9 353 votes

Rate RTX A5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or RTX A5000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

RTX A5000 vs Titan X Pascal

Aggregate performance score

Contents

Primary details

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Form factor & compatibility

VRAM capacity and type

Connectivity and outputs

API and SDK support

Synthetic benchmarks

Combined synthetic benchmark score

Passmark

Gaming performance

Average FPS across all PC games

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

Other comparisons

Community ratings

Comments