Quadro K5000 vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 1030 GTX 1050 GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1070 GTX 1080 GTX 1080 Ti TITAN Xp Titan X Pascal TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K2 K200 K280Q K500 K520 K560Q Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 SYNC Tesla K8 Tesla K10

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal with Quadro K5000, including specs and performance data.

Titan X Pascal
2016, $1,199
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
31.14
+225%

Titan X Pascal outperforms K5000 by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking207512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.140.28
Power efficiency9.706.11
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP102GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 August 2016 (10 years ago)17 August 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Titan X Pascal has 2093% better value for money than Quadro K5000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841536
Core clock speed1417 MHz706 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz706 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate342.990.37
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS2.169 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs224128
L1 Cache1.3 MB128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s172.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.46.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan++
CUDA+3.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 31.14
+225%
Quadro K5000 9.58

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
+225%
Quadro K5000 4009
Samples: 699

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12435−40
−71.8%
1440p74
+252%
21−24
4K58
+263%
16−18

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.67
+86.5%
71.40
1440p16.20
+86.4%
119.00
4K20.67
+86.8%
156.19
  • Titan X Pascal has 86% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Titan X Pascal has 86% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Titan X Pascal has 87% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 173
+246%
50−55
Counter-Strike 2 337
+237%
100−105
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+246%
24−27
Resident Evil 4 Remake 126
+260%
35−40

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 127
+263%
35−40
Battlefield 5 153
+240%
45−50
Counter-Strike 2 291
+242%
85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+252%
21−24
Far Cry 5 162
+260%
45−50
Fortnite 210
+250%
60−65
Forza Horizon 4 127
+263%
35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+277%
30−33
Valorant 296
+229%
90−95

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 78
+271%
21−24
Battlefield 5 147
+227%
45−50
Counter-Strike 2 205
+242%
60−65
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+245%
80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+261%
18−20
Dota 2 252
+236%
75−80
Far Cry 5 149
+231%
45−50
Fortnite 199
+232%
60−65
Forza Horizon 4 121
+246%
35−40
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+256%
45−50
Metro Exodus 96
+256%
27−30
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+277%
30−33
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+235%
55−60
Valorant 275
+244%
80−85

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 137
+243%
40−45
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+256%
16−18
Dota 2 232
+231%
70−75
Far Cry 5 140
+250%
40−45
Forza Horizon 4 112
+273%
30−33
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+240%
30−33
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+252%
27−30
Valorant 181
+229%
55−60

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170
+240%
50−55

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 111
+270%
30−33
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+242%
65−70
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+243%
30−33
Metro Exodus 58
+263%
16−18
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+250%
50−55
Valorant 258
+244%
75−80

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+254%
24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+270%
10−11
Far Cry 5 101
+237%
30−33
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+258%
24−27
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+250%
16−18

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+238%
24−27

4K
High

Atomic Heart 24−27
+257%
7−8
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+250%
10−11
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+230%
30−33
Metro Exodus 36
+260%
10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+278%
18−20
Valorant 257
+243%
75−80

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 71
+238%
21−24
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+250%
10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+240%
5−6
Dota 2 160
+256%
45−50
Far Cry 5 53
+231%
16−18
Forza Horizon 4 73
+248%
21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
+267%
12−14

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60
+233%
18−20

This is how Titan X Pascal and Quadro K5000 compete in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is 254% faster in 1080p
  • Titan X Pascal is 252% faster in 1440p
  • Titan X Pascal is 263% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.14 9.58
Recency 2 August 2016 17 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 122 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 225% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K5000, on the other hand, has 51% lower power consumption.

The Titan X Pascal is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K5000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
HD Graphics P630 Intel Graphics P630
vs
HD Graphics 400 400
HD Graphics P630 Intel Graphics P630
vs
210 OEM 210 OEM
HD Graphics P630 Intel Graphics P630
vs
GTX 1660 1660
HD Graphics P630 Intel Graphics P630
vs
N1X 48SM
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB P100 PCIe 12 GB
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 500 Ada Generation Mobile
GTX 1080 NVIDIA GTX 1080
vs
GeForce 840M 840M
GTX 1080 NVIDIA GTX 1080
vs
R5 M335 M335
GTX 1080 NVIDIA GTX 1080
vs
GT 620M 620M
GTX 1080 NVIDIA GTX 1080
vs
FirePro 2270 2270

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 3019 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 114 votes

Rate Quadro K5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or Quadro K5000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.