GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking202not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.15no data
Power efficiency9.68no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP102GK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (10 years ago)19 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841152 ×2
Core clock speed1417 MHz1006 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1072 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9102.9 ×2
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS2.47 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs9632 ×2
TMUs22496 ×2
L1 Cache1.3 MB96 KB
L2 Cache3 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s192.3 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 19 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

Titan X Pascal has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Titan X Pascal and GeForce GTX 760 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3014 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 27 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or GeForce GTX 760 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.