GeForce 7050 + nForce 630a vs Titan X Pascal

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking202not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.15no data
Power efficiency9.68no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGP102C68
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (10 years ago)1 February 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1417 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate342.90.85
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPSno data
ROPs961
TMUs2242
L1 Cache1.3 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1251 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 16 nm 90 nm

Titan X Pascal has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 463% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Titan X Pascal and GeForce 7050 + nForce 630a. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3014 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 10 votes

Rate GeForce 7050 nForce 630a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or GeForce 7050 + nForce 630a, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.