Rubin Ultra GPU vs Tesla V100 SXM2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameGV100GR110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date21 June 2017 (9 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512057344
Core clock speed1370 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2267 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate438.44,062.5
Floating-point processing powerno data260 TFLOPS
ROPs12824
TMUs3201792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cacheno data112 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1758 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth900.1 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA7.010.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 3600 Watt

Tesla V100 SXM2 has 1340% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 SXM2 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 47 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla V100 SXM2 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.