Arc A580 vs Tesla T4

Place in the ranking	270	225
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.86	12.83
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	TU104	DG2-512
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 September 2018 (8 years ago)	10 October 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	3072
Core clock speed	585 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	1590 MHz	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	13.6 billion	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	254.4	384.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	96
TMUs	160	192
Tensor Cores	320	384
Ray Tracing Cores	40	24
L1 Cache	2.5 MB	no data
L2 Cache	4 MB	8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.9	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.4	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-
DLSS	+	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla T4 23.35

Arc A580 28.97
+24.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla T4 9729
Samples: 101

Arc A580 12071
+24.1%

Samples: 352

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	80−85 −22.3%	103
1440p	45−50	56 +24.4%
4K	24−27	33 +37.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart	149	149
Counter-Strike 2	331	331
Cyberpunk 2077	73	73
Resident Evil 4 Remake	131	131

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart	110	110
Battlefield 5	110−120	110−120
Counter-Strike 2	263	263
Cyberpunk 2077	65	65
Far Cry 5	134	134
Fortnite	130−140	130−140
Forza Horizon 4	107	107
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120	110−120
Valorant	180−190	180−190

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart	79	79
Battlefield 5	110−120	110−120
Counter-Strike 2	129	129
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280	270−280
Cyberpunk 2077	57	57
Far Cry 5	122	122
Fortnite	130−140	130−140
Forza Horizon 4	102	102
Grand Theft Auto V	86	86
Metro Exodus	97	97
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120	110−120
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	174	174
Valorant	180−190	180−190

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	110−120	110−120
Cyberpunk 2077	53	53
Far Cry 5	114	114
Forza Horizon 4	87	87
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120	110−120
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68	68
Valorant	180−190	180−190

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

130−140

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	80	80
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	200−210	200−210
Grand Theft Auto V	37	37
Metro Exodus	57	57
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	170−180
Valorant	220−230	220−230

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	80−85	80−85
Cyberpunk 2077	39	39
Far Cry 5	87	87
Forza Horizon 4	75	75
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55	55

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

70−75

4K
High

Atomic Heart	21−24	21−24
Counter-Strike 2	19	19
Grand Theft Auto V	38	38
Metro Exodus	37	37
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	61	61
Valorant	170−180	170−180

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	45−50	45−50
Counter-Strike 2	30−35	30−35
Cyberpunk 2077	21	21
Far Cry 5	47	47
Forza Horizon 4	56	56
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35	30−35

4K
Epic

Fortnite

30−35

This is how Tesla T4 and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

Arc A580 is 29% faster in 1080p
Arc A580 is 24% faster in 1440p
Arc A580 is 38% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	23.35	28.97
Recency	13 September 2018	10 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	175 Watt