Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs Tesla P4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P104-100 P104-101 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P6
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
B370 B390 G3 G3 Extreme Graphics 2 Xe Mobile Graphics 4 Xe Mobile Pro B370 Pro B390 Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla P4 with Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Tesla P4
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
21.87
+90.8%

P4 outperforms Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.57no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)no data
GPU code nameGP104Panther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 September 2016 (10 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256032
Core clock speed886 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1114 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate178.2no data
Floating-point processing power5.704 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
+77.4%
31
−77.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Tesla P4 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Tesla P4 is 77% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.87 11.46
Recency 13 September 2016 5 January 2026

Tesla P4 has a 91% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years.

The Tesla P4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla P4 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
vs
W6170M FirePro W6170M
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
HD 7770 Radeon HD 7770
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
RX 5500 Radeon RX 5500
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Jetson T4000 Jetson T4000
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
Arc Pro B60 Arc Pro B60
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
GTX 470 GeForce GTX 470
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
GTS 450 GeForce GTS 450
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
HD 7350 PCI Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.4 92 votes

Rate Tesla P4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla P4 or Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.