Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Tesla P100 SXM2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated679
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.35
Power efficiencyno data6.38
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP100Polaris 23
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 April 2016 (10 years ago)2 July 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584640
Core clock speed1328 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors15,300 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate331.534.62
Floating-point processing power10.61 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs22432
L1 Cache1.3 MB160 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed704 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth720.9 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 April 2016 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 65 Watt

Tesla P100 SXM2 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 362% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P100 SXM2 and Radeon Pro WX 3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 54 votes

Rate Tesla P100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 112 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla P100 SXM2 or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.