GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Tesla M60

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking367not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.22no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGM204C89
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 August 2015 (10 years ago)1 April 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×248
Core clock speed557 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate150.8 ×27.200
Floating-point processing power4.825 TFLOPS ×20.0912 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×28
TMUs128 ×216
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 1 April 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 23 Watt

Tesla M60 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

320M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 1204% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M60 and GeForce 320M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M60 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 320M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 67 votes

Rate Tesla M60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate GeForce 320M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M60 or GeForce 320M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.