Arc A380M vs Tesla M60

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking367not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.22no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM204DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 August 2015 (10 years ago)24 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×21024
Core clock speed557 MHz1550 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate150.8 ×2128.0
Floating-point processing power4.825 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×232
TMUs128 ×264
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.1)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×26 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×296 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s ×2186.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA5.2-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 24 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 35 Watt

Tesla M60 has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A380M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 367% more advanced lithography process, and 757% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M60 and Arc A380M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M60 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A380M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 67 votes

Rate Tesla M60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 20 votes

Rate Arc A380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M60 or Arc A380M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.