Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Tesla M60

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M6-8Q M60-1Q M60-2Q M60-4A M60-8Q Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Tesla M6 Tesla M60
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M60 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Tesla M60
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
16.36
+6.7%

M60 outperforms 7-Cores iGPU by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking371389
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.22no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGM204Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 August 2015 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×27
Core clock speed557 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1178 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate150.8 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power4.825 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×2no data
TMUs128 ×2no data
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed1253 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+2.9%
34
−2.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 36
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 32
+0%
32
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 23
+0%
23
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 23
+0%
23
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Tesla M60 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M60 is 3% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.36 15.33
Recency 30 August 2015 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Tesla M60 has a 7% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 7-Cores iGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tesla M60 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU.

Be aware that Tesla M60 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla M60 Tesla M60
vs
P106-100 P106 100
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
vs
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
T400
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
vs
ATI HD 4650 4650
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
CMP 170HX 170HX
M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB V100 PCIe 32 GB
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
S9300 X2 S9300 X2
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
RX 5700 XT 5700 XT
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
GT 240 240
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
GT 430 430
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
P104-100 100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 67 votes

Rate Tesla M60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 114 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M60 or Arc 7-Cores iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.