Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs Tesla M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M40 with Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), including specs and performance data.

Tesla M40
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
24.43
+499%

M40 outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 499% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking264749
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Power efficiency7.61no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 2 (2021−2025)
GPU code nameGM200Raphael
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2015 (10 years ago)26 September 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072128
Core clock speed948 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1112 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate213.5no data
Floating-point processing power6.832 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs192no data
L1 Cache1.1 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−12019
−82.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 8−9
Resident Evil 4 Remake 6−7 6−7

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18 16−18
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 8−9
Far Cry 5 12−14 12−14
Fortnite 24−27 24−27
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 18−20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 16−18
Valorant 55−60 55−60

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18 16−18
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 16−18
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75 70−75
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 8−9
Dota 2 41 41
Far Cry 5 12−14 12−14
Far Cry 6 9−10 9−10
Fortnite 24−27 24−27
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 18−20
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 12−14
Metro Exodus 7−8 7−8
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 12−14
Valorant 55−60 55−60

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18 16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 8−9
Dota 2 37 37
Far Cry 5 12−14 12−14
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 18−20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 12−14
Valorant 55−60 55−60

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 24−27

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 8−9
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 30−35
Far Cry 6 5−6 5−6
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 2−3
Metro Exodus 2−3 2−3
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 30−35
Valorant 40−45 40−45

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 3−4
Far Cry 5 7−8 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 9−10
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 5−6

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 8−9

4K
High

Far Cry 6 5−6 5−6
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 16−18
Valorant 18−20 18−20

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 1−2
Dota 2 12−14 12−14
Far Cry 5 3−4 3−4
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 5−6
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 4−5

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 4−5

This is how Tesla M40 and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M40 is 479% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.43 4.08
Recency 10 November 2015 26 September 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

Tesla M40 has a 499% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 79% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla M40 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M40 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 94 votes

Rate Tesla M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 393 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M40 or Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.