Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) vs Tesla M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-2Q M2000 M3000 SE M4000 M5000 M6000 M6000 24 GB Tesla M4 Tesla M6 Tesla M40 Tesla M40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M40 with Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake), including specs and performance data.

Tesla M40
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
24.53
+164%

M40 outperforms Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking259522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.59no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGM200Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2015 (10 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307264
Core clock speed948 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1112 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate213.5no data
Floating-point processing power6.832 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs192no data
L1 Cache1.1 MB768 KB
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+150%
20
−150%
1440p14−16
+133%
6
−133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Palworld 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how Tesla M40 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M40 is 150% faster in 1080p
  • Tesla M40 is 133% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 24.53 9.30
Recency 10 November 2015 6 January 2025

Tesla M40 has a 164% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years.

The Tesla M40 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M40 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
Tesla M40 24 GB Tesla M40 24 GB
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
vs
GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
Tesla M4 Tesla M4
vs
RX 580X RX 580X
Tesla M4 Tesla M4
vs
Arc 3 A350M Arc 3 A350M
Tesla M4 Tesla M4
vs
A10M A10M
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
GRID K100 GRID K100
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
CMP 170HX 8 GB CMP 170HX 8 GB
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
310 OEM 310 OEM
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
GRID M10-8Q GRID M10-8Q
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
540 Mobile 540 Mobile
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
NVS 810 NVS 810
vs
L4 L4

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 94 votes

Rate Tesla M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 98 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M40 or Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.