Radeon Vega 11 Embedded vs Tesla M40 24 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking254not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.90no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM200Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2015 (10 years ago)13 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072704
Core clock speed948 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1112 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate213.557.20
Floating-point processing power6.832 TFLOPS1.83 TFLOPS
ROPs968
TMUs19244
L1 Cache1.1 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2015 13 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 35 Watt

Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 614% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M40 24 GB and Radeon Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M40 24 GB is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 48 votes

Rate Tesla M40 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 25 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M40 24 GB or Radeon Vega 11 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.