GeForce 9800S vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK210G94
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)15 July 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 249664
Core clock speed562 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,100 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec19.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs2x 4816
TMUs2x 20832
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 15 July 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 75 Watt

Tesla K80m has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9800S, on the other hand, has 75% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and GeForce 9800S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80m is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9800S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9800S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80m or GeForce 9800S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.