Arc Pro B50 vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data45.70
Power efficiencyno data33.33
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGK210BMG-G21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)5 September 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 24962048
Core clock speed562 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec332.8
Floating-point processing powerno data10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs2x 4816
TMUs2x 208128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length267 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 5 September 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 70 Watt

Arc Pro B50 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 329% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Arc Pro B50. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 11 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80m or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.