UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs Tesla K80

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K10 K20c K20m K20X K20Xm K40c K40d K40m K40s K40st K80 K80m
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 605 610 615 617 620 630 Mobile 710 Mobile 730 (Rocket Lake) 750 (Alder Lake) 770 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K80 with UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.

Tesla K80
2014
12 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
13.81
+9.7%

K80 outperforms Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking418443
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.5664.93
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)no data
GPU code nameGK210Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)30 March 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496 ×2no data
Core clock speed562 MHzno data
Boost clock speed824 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate171.4 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power4.113 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs48 ×2no data
TMUs208 ×2no data
L1 Cache208 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed1253 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth240.6 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.7-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
+0%
12
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Palworld 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Palworld 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
Palworld 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Palworld 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Palworld 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Palworld 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Palworld 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Tesla K80 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.81 12.59
Recency 17 November 2014 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 15 Watt

Tesla K80 has a 10% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tesla K80 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake).

Be aware that Tesla K80 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
PRO W6300 Radeon PRO W6300
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
R5 M230 Radeon R5 M230
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
9800M GT GeForce 9800M GT
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
HD 6680G2 Radeon HD 6680G2
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
R5 A230 Radeon R5 A230
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
vs
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
Tesla K40d Tesla K40d
vs
RX 6500 XT Radeon RX 6500 XT
Tesla K40d Tesla K40d
vs
A100 SXM4 40 GB A100 SXM4 40 GB
Tesla K40d Tesla K40d
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Tesla K40t Tesla K40t
vs
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
HD 7350 OEM PCI Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 189 votes

Rate Tesla K80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 144 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80 or UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.