ATI Radeon X1650 vs Tesla K40m

Place in the ranking	588	1492
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.06	no data
Power efficiency	2.38	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code name	GK110B	RV516
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 November 2013 (12 years ago)	20 November 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$7,699	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2880	no data
Core clock speed	745 MHz	635 MHz
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7.08 billion	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	210.2	2.540
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	240	4
L1 Cache	240 KB	no data
L2 Cache	1536 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	392 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB/s	6.272 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.5 (5.1)	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.175	N/A
CUDA	3.5	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla K40m 7.54
+4335%

ATI X1650 0.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla K40m 3143
+4327%

Samples: 4

ATI X1650 71
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.54	0.17
Recency	22 November 2013	20 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	80 nm

Tesla K40m has a 4335% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla K40m is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K40m is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1650 is a desktop one.