GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs Tesla K40m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking590not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.38no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK110BG92B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 November 2013 (12 years ago)1 July 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880112
Core clock speed745 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHzno data
Number of transistors7.08 billion754 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate210.237.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3629 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs24056
L1 Cache240 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount12 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1100 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s70.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.2.175N/A
CUDA3.51.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2013 1 July 2009
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 120 Watt

Tesla K40m has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

GTS 240 OEM, on the other hand, has 104% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K40m and GeForce GTS 240 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K40m is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTS 240 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 21 votes

Rate Tesla K40m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 43 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K40m or GeForce GTS 240 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.