Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs Tesla C2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking569not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.53no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF110TU106
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date25 July 2011 (15 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481920
Core clock speed574 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)247 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14165.6
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs56120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cache896 KB1.9 MB
L2 Cache768 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.07.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 247 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 7 years, a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 209% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2075 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2075 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2075 or Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.