GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Tesla C2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 7000 Quadro Plex 7000 C2075 C2090 M2075 M2090 X2070 X2090
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9800M GT 9800M GTS 9800M GT SLI 9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTX 9800M GTX SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla C2075 with GeForce 9800M GT SLI, including specs and performance data.

Tesla C2075
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 247 Watt
8.07
+329%

C2075 outperforms 9800M SLI by a whopping 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
9800M GT SLI 9800M GT SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking573969
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.531.12
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGF110NB9E-GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (15 years ago)15 July 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448192
Core clock speed574 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)247 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14no data
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs56no data
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.07 1.88
Recency 25 July 2011 15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 247 Watt 130 Watt

Tesla C2075 has a 329% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

9800M GT SLI, on the other hand, has 90% lower power consumption.

The Tesla C2075 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla C2075 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
Radeon 520 Radeon 520
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
GRID K520 GRID K520
6000 SDI NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
vs
RX 6650M RX 6650M
Tesla C2050 NVIDIA Tesla C2050
vs
ATI HD 3410 HD 3410
Tesla C2050 NVIDIA Tesla C2050
vs
FX 1300 FX 1300
Tesla C2070 NVIDIA Tesla C2070
vs
HD 8330 Mobile IGP HD 8330 Mobile IGP
Tesla C2075 NVIDIA Tesla C2075
vs
GTX 675M GTX 675M
Tesla C2090 NVIDIA Tesla C2090
vs
GMA 3100 GMA 3100
Tesla M2070 NVIDIA Tesla M2070
vs
9800M GS GeForce 9800M GS
Tesla M2070-Q NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G1 Graphics Xe G1
Tesla M2075 NVIDIA Tesla M2075
vs
ATI DDR VIVO OEM DDR VIVO OEM
Tesla M2075 NVIDIA Tesla M2075
vs
ATI DDR VIVO SE DDR VIVO SE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9800M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2075 or GeForce 9800M GT SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.