GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs Tesla C2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking569not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.53no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGF110GT218S
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (15 years ago)12 July 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44816
Core clock speed574 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)247 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate32.144.160
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs568
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.01.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 12 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 247 Watt 25 Watt

Tesla C2075 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

8400 GS Rev. 3, on the other hand, has 888% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2075 and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2075 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 161 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2075 or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.