Arc A370M vs Tegra X2 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.14
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP10BDG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data30 March 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speedno data1550 MHz
Boost clock speed1465 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate23.44131.2
Floating-point processing power0.7501 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1632
TMUs1664
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Length87 mmno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Tegra X2 GPU has 133% lower power consumption.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has a 167% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra X2 GPU and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra X2 GPU is a desktop graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Tegra X2 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 208 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra X2 GPU or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.