Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Tegra K1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGK20AMeteor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data14 December 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192896
Core clock speed756 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed951 MHz2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate7.608123.2
Floating-point processing power0.3652 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLES 3.14.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 65 Watt

Tegra K1 has 713% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra K1 and Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra K1 is a desktop graphics card while Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 10 votes

Rate Tegra K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra K1 or Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.