RTX A500 vs Tegra 4i GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.26
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTegra 4GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date19 February 2013 (13 years ago)10 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed660 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors11 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate1.320113.3
Floating-point processing powerno data7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLES 3.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2013 10 November 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 60 Watt

Tegra 4i GPU has 200% lower power consumption.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 4i GPU and RTX A500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra 4i GPU is a notebook graphics card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4i GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 170 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra 4i GPU or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.