RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Tegra 4 GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.00
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTegra 4AD106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 August 2013 (13 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed672 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors11 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate2.688244.1
Floating-point processing powerno data15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs4144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLES 3.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2013 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 115 Watt

Tegra 4 GPU has 475% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 4 GPU and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra 4 GPU is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 13 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra 4 GPU or RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.