Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs TITAN Xp

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 1030 GTX 1050 GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1070 GTX 1070 Ti GTX 1080 GTX 1080 Ti TITAN Xp Titan X Pascal TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Steam Deck 8CU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp with Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), including specs and performance data.

TITAN Xp
2017, $1,199
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
46.63
+1040%

TITAN Xp outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 1040% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking84745
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.74no data
Power efficiency14.43no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP102Raphael
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 April 2017 (9 years ago)26 September 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840128
Core clock speed1405 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1582 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate379.7no data
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs240no data
L1 Cache1.4 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5Xno data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1426 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD210−220
+1005%
19
−1005%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.71no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 37
+0%
37
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how TITAN Xp and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:

  • TITAN Xp is 1005% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 46.63 4.09
Recency 6 April 2017 26 September 2022
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm

TITAN Xp has a 1040% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 167% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
GTX 670M GeForce GTX 670M
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
GT 635 OEM GeForce GT 635 OEM
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
ATI Mobility 9600 PRO Turbo Mobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
Playstation 5 GPU Playstation 5 GPU
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
H100 PCIe H100 PCIe
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
H100 PCIe 96 GB H100 PCIe 96 GB
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
GTX 1060 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
vs
K3000M Quadro K3000M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.2 4755 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 393 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN Xp or Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.