RTX A2000 Mobile vs TITAN Xp

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 1030 GTX 1050 GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1070 GTX 1070 Ti GTX 1080 GTX 1080 Ti TITAN Xp Titan X Pascal TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A4 Mobile A1000 Mobile A1000 Mobile 6 GB A2000 Max-Q A2000 Max-Q 8 GB A2000 Mobile A2000 Mobile 8 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp with RTX A2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

TITAN Xp
2017, $1,199
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
46.62
+106%

TITAN Xp outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking84282
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.72no data
Power efficiency14.4318.44
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP102GA107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 April 2017 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402560
Core clock speed1405 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate379.7135.0
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS8.637 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs24080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache1.4 MB2.5 MB
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1426 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA6.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN Xp 46.62
+106%
RTX A2000 Mobile 22.64

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN Xp 19424
+106%
RTX A2000 Mobile 9433
Samples: 2071

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+103%
79
−103%
1440p85−90
+102%
42
−102%
4K75−80
+97.4%
38
−97.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.49no data
1440p14.11no data
4K15.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+0%
96
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Dota 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Palworld 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50
+0%
50
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how TITAN Xp and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • TITAN Xp is 103% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN Xp is 102% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN Xp is 97% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 46.62 22.64
Recency 6 April 2017 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 95 Watt

TITAN Xp has a 106% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 163% lower power consumption.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
HD 7950 Radeon HD 7950
vs
R5 M330 Radeon R5 M330
HD 6930 Radeon HD 6930
vs
8800 GT GeForce 8800 GT
HD 6450 Radeon HD 6450
vs
GTX 745 OEM GeForce GTX 745 OEM
HD 6750 Radeon HD 6750
vs
RTX 5060 GeForce RTX 5060
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 5090 SE GeForce RTX 5090 SE
GTX 1060 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
vs
Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
R9 M295X Radeon R9 M295X
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
HD 8250 Radeon HD 8250
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
HD 6790 Radeon HD 6790

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.2 4755 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 142 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN Xp or RTX A2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.