Radeon RX 7700S vs TITAN V

Place in the ranking	114	146
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.14	no data
Power efficiency	12.75	28.74
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code name	GV100	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	7 December 2017 (8 years ago)	4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	2048
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	320.0
Floating-point processing power	14.9 TFLOPS	20.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	320	128
Tensor Cores	640	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32
L0 Cache	no data	512 KB
L1 Cache	7.5 MB	512 KB
L2 Cache	4.5 MB	2 MB
L3 Cache	no data	32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	848 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	7.0	-
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 41.02
+10.9%

RX 7700S 37.00

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+10.9%

Samples: 152

RX 7700S 15446
Samples: 389

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	120−130 +7.1%	112
1440p	152 +167%	57
4K	82 +122%	37

Cost per frame, $

1080p	24.99	no data
1440p	19.73	no data
4K	36.57	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart	110−120	110−120
Counter-Strike 2	200−210	200−210
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90	85−90
Resident Evil 4 Remake	100−105	100−105

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart	110−120	110−120
Battlefield 5	130−140	130−140
Counter-Strike 2	200−210	200−210
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90	85−90
Far Cry 5	130	130
Fortnite	160−170	160−170
Forza Horizon 4	140−150	140−150
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150	140−150
Valorant	220−230	220−230

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart	110−120	110−120
Battlefield 5	130−140	130−140
Counter-Strike 2	200−210	200−210
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280	270−280
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90	85−90
Dota 2	140−150	140−150
Far Cry 5	123	123
Fortnite	160−170	160−170
Forza Horizon 4	140−150	140−150
Grand Theft Auto V	133	133
Metro Exodus	85−90	85−90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150	140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	147	147
Valorant	220−230	220−230

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	130−140	130−140
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90	85−90
Dota 2	140−150	140−150
Far Cry 5	117	117
Forza Horizon 4	140−150	140−150
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150	140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	84	84
Valorant	220−230	220−230

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

160−170

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	90−95	90−95
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	260−270	260−270
Grand Theft Auto V	67	67
Metro Exodus	50−55	50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	170−180
Valorant	250−260	250−260

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	95−100	95−100
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45	40−45
Far Cry 5	81	81
Forza Horizon 4	100−110	100−110
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75	70−75

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

95−100

4K
High

Atomic Heart	30−33	30−33
Counter-Strike 2	40−45	40−45
Grand Theft Auto V	68	68
Metro Exodus	30−35	30−35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43	43
Valorant	220−230	220−230

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	60−65	60−65
Counter-Strike 2	40−45	40−45
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22	20−22
Dota 2	100−110	100−110
Far Cry 5	39	39
Forza Horizon 4	70−75	70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55	50−55

4K
Epic

Fortnite

45−50

This is how TITAN V and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

TITAN V is 7% faster in 1080p
TITAN V is 167% faster in 1440p
TITAN V is 122% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	41.02	37.00
Recency	7 December 2017	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	100 Watt