Radeon RX 580 vs TITAN V

Place in the ranking	114	312
Place by popularity	not in top-100	3
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.14	14.58
Power efficiency	12.75	8.84
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GV100	Polaris 20
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 December 2017 (8 years ago)	18 April 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 580 has 252% better value for money than TITAN V.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	2304
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1257 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1340 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	185 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	193.0
Floating-point processing power	14.9 TFLOPS	6.175 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	32
TMUs	320	144
Tensor Cores	640	no data
L1 Cache	7.5 MB	576 KB
L2 Cache	4.5 MB	2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	848 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	7.0	-
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 40.93
+95%

RX 580 20.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+95%

Samples: 152

RX 580 8782
Samples: 33550

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	180−190	97 −46.1%
1440p	152 +253%	43
4K	82 +122%	37

Cost per frame, $

1080p	16.66	2.36 +85.8%
1440p	19.73	5.33 +73%
4K	36.57	6.19 +83.1%

RX 580 has 86% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 580 has 73% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RX 580 has 83% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart	55−60	55−60
Counter-Strike 2	120−130	120−130
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50	45−50
Resident Evil 4 Remake	45−50	45−50

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart	55−60	55−60
Battlefield 5	124	124
Counter-Strike 2	120−130	120−130
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50	45−50
Far Cry 5	83	83
Fortnite	153	153
Forza Horizon 4	108	108
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85	85
Valorant	150−160	150−160

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart	55−60	55−60
Battlefield 5	102	102
Counter-Strike 2	120−130	120−130
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	240−250	240−250
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50	45−50
Dota 2	110−120	110−120
Far Cry 5	76	76
Fortnite	106	106
Forza Horizon 4	101	101
Grand Theft Auto V	77	77
Metro Exodus	48	48
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70	70
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	72	72
Valorant	150−160	150−160

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	93	93
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50	45−50
Dota 2	110−120	110−120
Far Cry 5	71	71
Forza Horizon 4	82	82
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	49	49
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44	44
Valorant	150−160	150−160

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	45−50	45−50
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	150−160	150−160
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40	35−40
Metro Exodus	28	28
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	170−180
Valorant	170−180	170−180

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	60−65	60−65
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24	21−24
Far Cry 5	45−50	45−50
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	50−55
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35	30−35

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

50−55

4K
High

Atomic Heart	16−18	16−18
Counter-Strike 2	20−22	20−22
Grand Theft Auto V	57	57
Metro Exodus	18	18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27	27
Valorant	110−120	110−120

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	37	37
Counter-Strike 2	20−22	20−22
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10	9−10
Dota 2	70−75	70−75
Far Cry 5	26	26
Forza Horizon 4	41	41
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18	18

4K
Epic

Fortnite

This is how TITAN V and RX 580 compete in popular games:

TITAN V is 86% faster in 1080p
TITAN V is 253% faster in 1440p
TITAN V is 122% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	40.93	20.99
Recency	7 December 2017	18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	185 Watt

TITAN V has a 95% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.

RX 580, on the other hand, has 26% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 580 in performance tests.