Quadro P2000 vs TITAN V

Place in the ranking	115	361
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.15	3.92
Power efficiency	12.74	18.02
Architecture	Volta (2017−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GV100	GP106
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	7 December 2017 (8 years ago)	6 February 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$585

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

TITAN V has 6% better value for money than Quadro P2000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	1024
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1076 MHz
Boost clock speed	1455 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	21,100 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	465.6	94.72
Floating-point processing power	14.9 TFLOPS	3.031 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	40
TMUs	320	64
Tensor Cores	640	no data
L1 Cache	7.5 MB	384 KB
L2 Cache	4.5 MB	1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	201 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	5 GB
Memory bus width	3072 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	848 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	651.3 GB/s	140.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	7.0	6.1
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN V 40.93
+136%

Quadro P2000 17.37

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+136%

Samples: 154

Quadro P2000 7268
Samples: 4766

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN V 167528
+633%

Quadro P2000 22847

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

TITAN V 153221
+550%

Quadro P2000 23568

GeekBench 5 CUDA

TITAN V 179522
+729%

Quadro P2000 21668

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	130−140	56 −56.9%
1440p	152 +660%	20
4K	82 +413%	16

Cost per frame, $

1080p	23.07	10.45 +54.7%
1440p	19.73 +32.5%	29.25
4K	36.57	36.56 +0%

Quadro P2000 has 55% lower cost per frame in 1080p
TITAN V has 33% lower cost per frame in 1440p
TITAN V and Quadro P2000 have nearly equal cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	95−100	95−100
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40	35−40
Hogwarts Legacy	30−35	30−35
Resident Evil 4 Remake	35−40	35−40

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	75−80	75−80
Counter-Strike 2	95−100	95−100
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40	35−40
Far Cry 5	47	47
Fortnite	144	144
Forza Horizon 4	70−75	70−75
Hogwarts Legacy	30−35	30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	53	53
Valorant	130−140	130−140

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	75−80	75−80
Counter-Strike 2	95−100	95−100
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	220−230	220−230
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40	35−40
Dota 2	102	102
Far Cry 5	41	41
Fortnite	60	60
Forza Horizon 4	70−75	70−75
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70	65−70
Hogwarts Legacy	30−35	30−35
Metro Exodus	35−40	35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	41	41
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	38	38
Valorant	130−140	130−140

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	75−80	75−80
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40	35−40
Dota 2	98	98
Far Cry 5	35	35
Forza Horizon 4	70−75	70−75
Hogwarts Legacy	30−35	30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	29	29
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25	25
Valorant	130−140	130−140

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	35−40	35−40
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	120−130	120−130
Grand Theft Auto V	30−33	30−33
Metro Exodus	21−24	21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170	160−170
Valorant	150−160	150−160

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	50−55	50−55
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	16−18
Far Cry 5	21	21
Forza Horizon 4	40−45	40−45
Hogwarts Legacy	18−20	18−20
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27	24−27

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	14−16	14−16
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35	30−35
Hogwarts Legacy	10−12	10−12
Metro Exodus	14−16	14−16
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13	13
Valorant	90−95	90−95

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	27−30	27−30
Counter-Strike 2	14−16	14−16
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8	7−8
Dota 2	60−65	60−65
Far Cry 5	9	9
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	30−35
Hogwarts Legacy	10−12	10−12
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7	7

4K
Epic

Fortnite

This is how TITAN V and Quadro P2000 compete in popular games:

TITAN V is 132% faster in 1080p
TITAN V is 660% faster in 1440p
TITAN V is 413% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	40.93	17.37
Recency	7 December 2017	6 February 2017
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	5 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	75 Watt

TITAN V has a 136% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 140% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro P2000, on the other hand, has 70% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P2000 is a workstation one.